QUOTE (Shane @ Jan 22 2009, 01:24 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>gary you are clutching at straws...
With people tight for money you would be made to buy a potential money pit,you need to administer serious TLC to an evo every 4 or 5 k (as a daily driver in a cash strapped life that doesn't compute) plus the chances of buying a bad one are inordinately high,do you know evo engines have been known to last as little as 5000 miles?? as a daily driver for a cash strapped person it would be financial suicide.
As in comparing it to buying a gti for 32 grand, I think we both know who would lose more money lets say after 2 yrs....
QUOTE And it would be a 60 oddk car that is noe worth 16,he would probably take your hand off for 15 though and if you kept it for 2 years you would be lucky to get 8 for it esp after the mileage starts to creep up.which is another point on re sale value how many evo's are there around with 100k plus miles that havent had serious work done to them? while the 2.0TFSI is a relatively new engine there are already examples with pretty honest mileage and im sure with proper servicing it will prove to be as reliable as the old 1.8T.
EVO 4s would be around the 8 grand mark, I reckon worst case senario that EVO would be worth 12 - 13 grand in a few yrs.. The GTi would still lose halve its value over the same period which would be 15 odd grand.. And as for engine reliability 60k ain't high at all, it probably only due a timing belt at the next service and AFAIK the EVO engine is actualy quite reliable when driven with repect, there have also being examples of VAG cars including the tfsi engines going bad with small mileage...
QUOTE Suggesting the anni as a cash saving alternative is the most sensible thing you have said,but seeing as how this thread is about the MK5 GTI if you drove a mk4 GTI and mk5 GIT back to back you would realise there is no comparison in the handling/poise and set up of the car (power aside) no offence to any anni owners.
The EVO while it may not be a VAG heads first choice, is an excelent car and puts down serious bhp. where as to get a mk4 ANNI, mk5 gti or most VAGs up to anywhere near there baseline BHP would cost you thousands more.. Hence my saying the EVO is better value for the price, which for someone look a fast car for cheap, It would be a sensible option?? As oppose to paying 30 grand for a car with less power that will depreciate a lot more.
QUOTE I dont believe for one second that the Mk5 git is a bigger target than the evo,the VRs maybe as its a 4 dr saloon with decent power as are the proper volvos another fast saloon.
I didn't say its a bigger target, I said there would be more GTi's stolen due to them being more popular and more of them being in the country, also as some of these lets say are for "JOBS" these "lads" don't want a "LOOK AT ME" type of car where as the mk5 can blend in, the EVO will always stick out.. The VRs was a targeted car when it first came out due to its crap security (earlier ones had no imob, AFAIK) But that mean fcuk all whe someones coming in your door for the keys.. And as for stolen cars for some reason there are lots of ALMERA's saloons being stolen for "JOB's" don't know why
QUOTE Ive said my piece i cant believe im defending a mk5 gti against an EVO on vagdrivers seesh!
Shane.
Well I wasn't puttin them up against each other, I was saying I would buy that 7yr old EVO for 16grand over that 08 gti for 32 grand, and I stand by that.. If thats a sin.. forgive me I am a sinner but at least I am honest.. You have to agree a 330bhp 4wd jap is a good car and it would be faster, pokey-er and handle better than the mk5 gti - hands down.. And thats comparing a 7yr old EVO to a brand new GTi.. the newer type EVO 10 would piss all over the 3.2litre r32 and thats a fact.. maybe the Golf is more refined and reliable but I would take the EVO over the golf in that case too....